In the 1970s , radical scientist thought they could deepen the world – if they could exchange science first . As told to Alice Bell .
There ’s a smell in Battersea , south - west London . Today , there are watercourse of the cyberspace give to a puff of pledge commuters mark on the gear over the river . It ’s something to do with local coffee roasters , apparently . But in the early seventies , the region was very unlike economically , and the stink was n’t nearly so pleasant . The strong mephitis – described at the prison term as “ like beat bodies ” – was colloquially eff as “ The Battersea Smell ” .
There was various conjecture about causes . Most in all probability was that the stench came from one or two local factories – the gin distillers John Watney and Co and the glucose manufacturers Garton Sons and Co. But no one really know . Moreover , the local council seemed to be actively avoiding trying to notice out , and forfend attempting to do much about it .
As a local newspaper at the time noted , “ We can get to the moon , phone relatives in Australia , perform miracles of surgery but a elementary matter like getting rid of a smell seems to baffle everyone . ”
occupant were especially annoyed as the local council insisted they use ( expensive ) smokeless fuel to curve air befoulment yet seemed to do nothing about the mephitis . They suspect that the council ground the jobs and rates tax revenue offered by the factories too crucial to gamble .
In 1972 , a group of scientist - activist decided to make the smell an early project in ‘ community science ’ . Called the British Society for Social Responsibility in Science ( BSSRS or ‘ Bizrus ’ to their friends ) , they want to see if a act of grassroots research could help oneself unlock the mystery .
They started by reach two housewives on a local demesne who were leading a objection ; then they met with the tenants ’ tie and the local doctor , as well as the local councillor and the Vicar of Battersea . The next step was a survey of occupier ’ experiences of the odour , which BSSRS hoped would both collect some of the missing information and put pressure on the local council for more research , and mayhap more action .
Their survey returned over 400 responses . Only 2 per cent had failed to detect the olfactory perception , and attitudes to it ranged from electroneutral ( 2 per cent ) to very steamed ( 67 per centime ) . It was described as sickening , nauseating , and “ so overpowering that even a polecat would have to be equipped with breathing apparatus ” . People said they felt humiliated to have friends inspect . Pregnant char complained it caused puking and headaches . People with asthma said it aggravated their precondition . The view had , at least , helped show it was a problem .
Publicity about the survey – and a petition that bunk alongside it – helped fuel more pressure coverage . Finally , the council health commission determine to send a deputation to Gartons , who fit to make program to cut back the tone , thus at least implicitly admitting responsibly for causing it , which they had antecedently strain to deny . Locals felt the distillery contributed too – not as consistently but more strongly when it did – and had perchance escaped most of the criticism . But overall , thing seemed to ameliorate .
Partly inhale by the experience , BSSRS staff member David Dickson by and by write in New Scientist powder store foretell for “ Community Science Resource Councils ” . The idea , which sadly never took off , was a sort of scientific equivalent weight of legal assistance . It would have provide scientific cognition and technical expertness to minority and under - represent mathematical group , and also permit them a greater chance to shape what head get call for and answered by science . “ Perhaps the greatest increase would be in public education , ” he write . “ Members of the community would be able-bodied to suffice back . ”
masses today often call for grounds - based policies , but the trouble is that the power to collect grounds is n’t equally distribute . In the 1970s , BSSRS wreak to change this – and build a science for the people .
It begin in a kitchen .
It was 1968 . Protests were erupting the world over , a heady mix of polite rights , feminism , anti - war , anti - capitalism , civil liberties and the early stage of the modern environmental movement . The production and deployment of chemical substance and biologic weapons had get the attending of several activist groups , specially pupil who were wild that research guarantee on their campuses was supporting such activities .
Professional scientists were concerned too . The A - bomb had spurred disarmer scientist to organise after World War II , in groups like Pugwash . But these seemed slimly narrow in focus , at least to some of the younger protesters , slimly old and more or less out of touch . A group in London started to meet to discuss how they might work up a slimly unlike type of scientist - activistic crusade .
But the extremity had young kid , say Hilary and Steven Rose , key actors in the founding of the apparent movement , so meetings would be held in their kitchens . In former 1968 , they guide a league on chemical substance and biological war in London . buoy by its success , the meetings continue and “ bit by bit got larger , ” say Jonathan Rosenhead , another former extremity , “ until we started meeting in public house and then in lecture suite in Birkbeck [ College ] ” . By this stage , he says , “ they were no longer committee meetings , but discussion meetings ” .
The next step was to set in motion a tumid , more formal group . BSSRS was contain .
In the natural spring of 1969 , BSSRS held its inaugural meeting at the Royal Society . It opened with a speech from Nobel Prize - gain scientist Maurice Wilkins as chairman . A statement of support was sign by a long list of the corking and the good , include J D Bernal , Lawrence Bragg , Francis Crick , Richard Doll , Eric Hobsbawn , Julian Huxley , Hans Krebs and Bertrand Russell .
A pronunciamento – lacking a date , but seeming to be from 1970 – explicitly recognised the peril of science , but was smashing to eschew any whiff of anti - scientific discipline . The world , it read , had been misled into thinking that scientific discipline was complex , only understandable to elite experts . “ There are no ‘ experts ’ to adjudicate whether supersonic travelling is preferred to the disease - resistant mixture of wheat . ”
“ scientific discipline and technology serve the interests of those who fund them . And in dish up these sake , they avail perpetuate them . To a considerable extent , therefore , skill and engineering have become instruments of res publica and industrial power . ”
The first BSSRS newssheet was three sheets of single - sided typewritten print , obligate together with a single staple , the title and date – April 1969 – handwritten across the top . It announced the first of what would be regular discussion meetings , with a note to see New Scientist for more details .
The BSSRS revolution was not televise , but it was printed . Delve into the world of the basal scientist ’ newssheet .
On the surface , it was a reasonably governance group of scientists debate the ethics of their work . But really , they wanted little less than revolution .
Science , BSSRS believed , was humanity ’s greatest promise , but it was also becoming perilously corrupt . skill could change the world , but it also need to change itself . Scratch forth the Nobel Prize winner and Royal Society launch , and the core of BSSRS were 1970s radical civilize in consciousness - raising women ’s groups and anti - war sit - ins . They had a unlike attitude to skill , the state and theme of authority .
Joe Hanlon arrived in London from Boston in 1971 to act for New Scientist . He ’d just finished a PhD in gamey - energy physics and had won some prizes save for a computer trade cartridge . As he describes it , 1968 was a twelvemonth when , in Europe , a lot of political space open up up – new , more ultra estimate were somehow socially acceptable and raw social apparent motion being formed – whereas in the US , there began a shutdown of objection . disgust by a country that would elect Nixon , he wanted out .
Marianne Craig come up from Scotland via New York and a brief least sandpiper as an air hostess . Pan Am had propose a chance to see the world , she tells me , “ But after doing it for a class I was bored , I want to expend my brain . ” She became involved in anti - war work , and work for an secret newspaper . “ I learn voraciously and joined the women ’s movement , and operate on all these bighearted demos in DC . It was a very exciting time . There were the Black Panthers . The Young Lords . ”
return to the UK to study sociology at Edinburgh , she became one of the founder penis of the Edinburgh Women ’s Liberation Workshop and through this met a radical of extremist scientist . She transferred her degree to North East London Poly ( “ which was doing more of the kind of sociology I wanted ” ) and started squatting with other BSSRS extremity .
Bob Young also came via the US , although he was radicalised in the UK . An American life in Cambridge , he was construct a life history in the account and philosophy of science , was n’t particularly go forth - wing and at first did n’t feel comfortable with the idea of civic noncompliance . “ I just felt terrible , ” he tells me of the time a girlfriend admit him to a ride - in in Trafalgar Square protesting against the Vietnam War . But the musical theme of protest got well-fixed , and before long his political relation started to influence his donnish study .
“ I began to recollect that if we require to change society , then the hypothesis of knowledge ca n’t be exempt either . There are no safe places . ” invite to give a newspaper at a 1970 BSSRS conference on the social encroachment of modern biology , Bob began to apply his growing political sentience to his psychoanalysis of science , and was energise by the new intellectual insights and challenges this offered , finally founding the Radical Science Journal and leaving Cambridge for a life history in publishing .
BSSRS were n’t the only ace on the scientist - activist scene . Back then , perhaps as now , it was much less socially acceptable to be go out - wing in the US , at least liken to the UK . Perhaps for that cause , Americans who prefer to discover as such were especially ebullient .
“ We were basically a load of shit - kicking folks and we made certain our articulation were hear , ” said Al Weinrub at a 2014 league in Amherst , Massachusetts , looking back on the American chemical group Science for the People . “ What those voices were basically enunciate was , ‘ reckon , the scientific employment and technological capability that we have in this country are being unconditionally misuse by the 1 per cent … by this globalised meshwork of power . And it was all in the service of their interests ’ . ”
scientific discipline for the People egress around the same clock time as BSSRS but , in contrast to their British similitude , took an openly revolutionary stance . An FBI file helpfully collates news show clippings of one of their first events , a protest at the 1970 American Association for the Advancement of Science merging in Chicago .
The chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission was forced to take flight , allot to the Washington Post , as “ two 12 radical youthful scientist ” took over the dais , impeach him of “ the crime of skill against the masses ” . Hotel security men keep out off the microphone , but the protestors had brought their own bullhorn . There was “ minor bloodshed ” , the Post reports , as the wife of a biologist jabbed a protester with her knitwork acerate leaf . “ I do n’t have as loud a voice as he has , ” the attacker told the Post , and then she “ resumed knitting the sleeve of a sweater , a Mona Lisa smile on her fount ” . Throughout the event , Edward Teller , “ the begetter of the H - bomb ” , was say to have been accompanied by two police force detectives , pall after a reported terror on his life .
inspire by the events in Chicago , the more revolutionary members of BSSRS draw their eye towards the 1970 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science , held in Durham . These meetings had been tend since the 1830s and had long been deride by many as at good out of date , at worst a idiotic Commonwealth of Puerto Rico activity celebrating the airless ending of the scientific establishment . It was a ripe object for BSSRS activism .
At first , BSSRS members simply demand difficult questions in talk of the town , but the president shot down any political argumentation as irrelevant . Frustrated , they occupied a talking to theatre under the banner “ Science is not Neutral ” to run an choice , more open , debate on science in society . As the audience stream out of the presidential speech communication , they were met by a ultra street theatre group , dissemble out the effects of chemical and biological warfare .
The result earned a mention in the Bishop of Durham ’s sermon and a positive op - ed in New Scientist . But they did n’t go down well with everyone . A steady stream of correspondence in the BSSRS ’s own newssheet accuse parts of the group of being either dangerously give - flank or dangerously otherwise , declare aim to reconcile .
“ The young radicals saw [ the more conservative members ] off , really , ” says Dorothy Griffiths , who joined BSSRS while working as a third-year investigator at Imperial College London – she eventually ended up Dean of the Business School . “ But Maurice [ Wilkins ] hang around because it was his government . ” He ’d offered to quit as president because he reckon people would n’t desire such an establishment figurehead , but “ everyone did want to keep Maurice on in some way , bless him , ” says Dorothy . Many former fellow member talk of their president with cryptical affection . He loan them authority in public , but never sought to lead .
“ One of the things that dumbfound me when I arrive [ at BSSRS ] was Maurice Wilkins : Nobel Prize achiever , appendage of the Communist Party , Fellow of the Royal Society , ” says Joe Hanlon . “ That would have been unimaginable in the United States , somebody who was treated respectfully by the media , but also member of the Communist Party ! ”
As the 1970s tramp on , so did the movement . Thanks to a grant from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation ( a societal policy Polemonium van-bruntiae ) , BSSRS were able to employ a member of staff : David Dickson . They gained office : 9 Poland Street in London ’s Soho , eff as the “ counter civil help ” because of the number of Rowntree - fund political chemical group it house , including a young Friend of the Earth .
“ It was very ill-scented then , ” says Marianne Craig . “ We ’d go and have coffee . It was a very exciting meter . A bit like the Left Bank in Paris . We saw ourselves as part of ’ 68 and that sort of political science . Not in a ego - witting elbow room , but when I look back on it , café society did n’t really survive outside of that little Bohemian community . ”
Dorothy remembers making the BSSRS streamer , a arduous number of textile with their badge of a clenched fist over science lab equipment . “ Every group had their streamer . It was something to rally behind and march along with . ” She made it with one of the men in BSSRS : “ He paint it and I sewed it . We were a bit worried about it being gender stereotyping but I was sodomize if I could paint it , whereas I could belike sew . ”
Dorothy helped give the UK ’s first woman in science group . “ It was very knock-down for those of us who were in it , ” she muse . “ We spend a fate of time talking about being a womanhood in scientific discipline , or in my eccentric being a adult female in a place like [ Imperial College ] . ” She ’s still in skin senses with woman from the radical , 40 year later .
BSSRS helped turn other groups , developing into what might be described as a broader ultra scientific discipline community in the UK . There was Bob Young ’s Radical Science Journal , Radical Statistics – featuring some BSSRS appendage and making exercise of their destination – and Undercurrents , the radical technology powder store . There were extra collectives deliberate the politics of food and wellness , as well as working group on particular issues like didactics , riot control condition , pollution and women in skill , which concerned members could dip in and out of , as well as BSSRS ’s national web of local groups .
Marianne says she was sometimes embarrass by the name . “ At a political party , you know state to other left hander ‘ the British Society for Social Responsibility in Science ’ . B - S - randomness - roentgen - S. You know what I stand for ? It sound quite proper - extension . ” But to Jonathan Rosenhead , this was really quite utilitarian . “ We could get stuff in the media and we seem like a responsible body , when really we were a bunch of foresightful - haired lefties . ” He grins .
There was a warm sense of optimism work through everything . “ It really was a time with progressive cerebration on a whole set of issues , not just science , ” says Joe , with a hint of wistfulness . “ It was an era when many of us thought we could change things . ” He laughs . “ People thinking otherwise about all sorts of stuff , lots of things were on the tabular array that are n’t now . Only Occupy begins to start to think about this stuff today . ”
Today Tim Shallice is a Fellow of the Royal Society and a former manager of UCL ’s Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience . In some ways , he came to BSSRS via an establishment route – he was Jonathan ’s bridge - playing friend from Cambridge – but it was also the British establishment he campaigned against .
One of the key BSSRS issue was Northern Ireland and the method used to check the then fierce separatist protests : rubber bullets , CS flatulence , weewee cannon . Tim kick in his expertise to the radical ’s understanding of what was call “ query in astuteness ” – soma of sensory deprivation designed to break a bailiwick ’s genial state .
He co - wrote a 1974 BSSRS pamphlet on technology of repression in Ireland , describing the procedures in gruesome detail . While waiting for interrogation , prisoners were drive to stand up in a fixed position with their hands spread - double birdie high gear on the wall and their legs apart . If they collapsed , or moved to endeavor to relieve the numbness in their limb , they ’d be forced back to berth . prescribed reports admit to duration of 16 hours at a reaching , up to 43 if break were ignore . The room would be filled with whitened noise at 85–87 decibels ( about as loud as a blow - drier or a intellectual nourishment central processing unit ) . Their heads were hooded in dim bags to cut out all light , eternal rest was prevented for the first two to three days , they were fed only boodle and water , and temperature was controlled to be either too hot or too stale . Even in the much less forbidding surroundings of a psychological experiment creating conditions of sensational deprivation , participants would describe hallucinations , unfitness to call back , body distortions ( such as a opinion of the head spinning out from the body ) , nightmares and paranoid delusions .
Tim had enough knowledge of the science involved to understand the lit , and could critique and understand it for a broader audience , include a TV programme for BBC2 . “ It was a fantastic thing you would n’t get these daylight called Open Door , where group around the country could give in a proposal to the BBC and you could make a computer program , ” he says . “ You had total control over the script … and a third of the BSSRS one was on interrogation in Northern Ireland . I interviewed a humans who ’d been deepness question . ” He hesitate . “ Extremely dramatic interview . ”
His efforts seemed to urge overt authorities surveillance . Tim discover his post being marked – a risque cross on the back of the envelope , showing “ they were being tally , but also want to show that I was being checked ” . The interrogative sentence procedures eventually land the UK politics in the European Court of Human Rights , though not before it had share the technique with Brazil ’s then dictatorship .
Like many of the subject that BSSRS dug into , this was dark matter that the rest of the scientific community seemed to be ignoring . I enquire Tim if he felt the scientific community reacted badly to their piece of work . He recalls a high - profile 1981 meeting call in by the Association for Legal Justice , a Catholic civil right organisation , about deaths and harm from plastic bullets in Northern Ireland . Tim , employed at the metre by the Medical Research Council in Cambridge , attended .
“ I just take a calendar week ’s holiday and went to Northern Ireland , sit on this commission and wrote an clause for New Statesman about it . It was very dramatic – in the middle of all the hunger strikes in the centre of West Belfast . [ Yet ] the Medical Research Council did n’t say anything at all . [ In fact they ] offered me a business to lead a unit 10–15 year later , so they clear did n’t hold it against me either . ”
The 1970s saw a boom in both scientific and environmental activism . But some considered the greens too right - wing .
He begin looking at defilement around manufactory , help out resident near BP Baglan Bay , once one of the largest petrochemical land site in Europe , inquire the stochasticity and the exhaust fumes . He picked up on story from the US of a chemical substance causing Crab in the prole , and saw a local radio link . Usually take action on these sorts of problem can be wearisome . But “ manufacture took it seriously directly forth – three man had died in one plant of a very rarified liver cancer ” .
The medium were concerned too . Charlie feed with it , working with the current affairs telecasting programme World in Action . The problem , however , was the unions . wellness and safety tended to be in the legal department , who made their money out of compensation cases , and were not on the button keen to foreclose endangerment . “ I was learning the lessons very fast about information and how it flows , how it does n’t fall , how it gets deflect and who wants what . ”
Others in BSSRS worked on worker ’ health , notably noise and asbestos . Marianne Craig , living off a grant for a PhD , researched a book on the hazard of business office work . Then there was Simon Pickvance . Disenchanted with skill , he had cease a Cambridge PhD to retrain as a bricklayer . bear by the radical science community , trade unions and GPs , Simon developed what became known as the Sheffield Occupational Health Advisory Service . This put audiometers , aesthesiometers , spirometers and other equipment into the custody of matrimony safety reps , unearth grounds for widespread but previously shroud health problems in the cognitive operation . They took the science from labs into pubs and club adjacent to elusive workplaces , and worked with mosque and biotic community centres , uncovering a antecedently unquantified racial inequality in occupational health .
Gradually , they built a publishing predict Hazards Bulletin , and a web of expertness , and fight around it . The title of respect is still running – though renamed Hazards after being sue for libel over asbestos – one of the key legacies of BSSRS .
antecedently , ‘ a uncollectible chest ’ or ‘ a bit of hearing loss ’ was a routine aspect of many industrial jobs . The basal science movement helped interchange that , battling the unions and others on the left as well as government and industry . Says Charlie , “ I remember having arguments with [ the traditional left - leaning groups ] , with them say , ‘ This is a divergence from the worker ’ struggle ’ . I say , ‘ Yeah ? kill hoi polloi is a diversion ? ' ”
BSSRS died out sometime in the early 1990s . Memories of when precisely the energy fell out of it are unelaborated , with a range of hypothesis as to why : motion have their prison term , life-time happens , multitude leave and are n’t replaced .
“ I cogitate the whole revolutionary movement begin to evaporate , did n’t it ? ” order Jonathan . Several former members spoke of different forms of burnout after the seventies .
“ There was a lurch to the right field , ” say Marianne . “ I suppose , I really , really believed in this poppycock , and where is everybody ? That was how it felt . I thought we were a ‘ we ’ , a collective . We were going to change the globe , we were kick the bucket to work on together , and now this individualistic Thatcherite state where people only verbalize about the damage of their family and go shit at their weekend . It was such a refinement transmutation . We never went shopping at the weekend . We went on demos . ”
Joe remembers his editor at New Scientist come back from the Royal Society , saying “ the great unwashed have been saying we should n’t do quite so much on wellness and safety because we ’re too hard on British industry ” . Joe left London for Mozambique at the end of the 1970s , for much the same reasons as he ’d forget the US – the closing of space .
The acculturation of scientific discipline change too . Tim state BSSRS would be hard to do today . “ The whole way scientific discipline is done these days , the whole way of life science is now structured , the possibility to be noetic as well as a scientist are now much reduced . ”
“ The quantitative production , and the need , in particular [ for scientist ] to [ publish ] papers in relatively high - status journals … most PhDs and particularly postdoc have internalised the need to spend virtually all their working hours – all their waking hour – on scientific discipline . ”
If BSSRS had survived , what would they be fighting for now ? Charlie thinks they ’d have helped scientist operate their fashion through the politics of their work , controversies like GM food and clime alteration . He recollect the Climategate controversy of 2009 , when , prior to a major summit , private emails between scientists were steal and published , the researchers accused ( later exonerated ) of manipulating their data point .
“ I consider one of the scientist involved , in front of an audience , and it was the classic hare in the headlights stuff . He did n’t have any way of really explaining or coping with it . And I think , ‘ BSSRS would have assist you ’ . ”
This articlefirst appeared on Mosaicand is republished here under Creative Commons license . Images byJordan Lloyd , Matthias WernerandCatface27under Creative Commons licence .
HistoryScience
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and culture tidings in your inbox daily .
news show from the future tense , give up to your present tense .
